Credibility Analysis System
“D’ye ken?” — broad Scots for “do you know?” It’s the question every analysis answers.
Deyeken extracts every claim from an analysis, gathers supporting and opposing evidence, and produces a transparent credibility score — putting the reader back in control.
~2–11 MINUTES · ~$0.10–$0.85 PER ANALYSIS · PRE-BETA
Economic Analysis Opinion
Solid72 ±2Well-sourced Substack opinion that verifies 14 of 15 claims but underexplains the independence advocates' case and omits historical stakes.
Analysis of an article in · Questionable
Investment Analysis
Mixed58 ±3Substack investment analysis with solid fact-checking (80% of claims corroborated) but incomplete treatment of its core thesis—the execution-layer argument lacks substantive engagement with the counter-case that incumbents may acquire AI more cheaply than Anthropic acquires authority.
Analysis of an article in · Questionable
Opinion Analysis
Strong82 ±3Yale Review opinion piece on LLM limitations is well-sourced and fact-checked, but rests its core argument on unexamined philosophical assumptions about understanding.
Analysis of an article by in · Moderate
Analysis And Opinion
Solid72 ±3SDXCentral's antitrust-focused analysis is well-sourced but omits counterarguments and lacks comparative precedent to test its core claims.
Analysis of an article by in · Moderate
Opinion Analysis
Mixed54 ±3Well-sourced critique of AI overselling with significant blind spots: missing enterprise success cases, mitigation strategies, and historical tech adoption context.
Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
News Analysis
Solid62 ±4The Atlantic presents well-sourced reporting on economist consensus-shift, but omits substantive counterarguments and historical context needed for full assessment.
Analysis of an article by in · Credible
Technology Analysis And Market Commentary
Mixed52 ±3SiliconAngle's edge-AI thesis is well-sourced on technical feasibility but substantially incomplete on market scale, cost trade-offs, and Nvidia's competing centralized strategy.
Analysis of an article by in · Moderate
Opinion Analysis
Mixed49 ±3Well-sourced opinion on a legitimate strategy, but incomplete on deployment risks and historical context that enterprises need to evaluate the idea.
Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
The Approach
Deyeken assesses the credibility of the evidentiary record across three weighted axes — source credibility, evidence alignment, and completeness. It surfaces supporting and opposing evidence so you can judge for yourself.