Credibility Analysis System
“D’ye ken?” — broad Scots for “do you know?” It’s the question every analysis answers.
Deyeken extracts every claim from an analysis, gathers supporting and opposing evidence, and produces a transparent credibility score — putting the reader back in control.
~2–11 MINUTES · ~$0.10–$0.85 PER ANALYSIS · PRE-BETA
Business Analysis Opinion
Mixed56 ±3Well-sourced opinion that makes a coherent case for workflow-centric AI adoption, but omits real-world failure evidence and lacks adoption baselines to test the claim's scope.
Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
Interview Transcript
Mixed56 ±3A well-sourced Democratic candidate interview with strong fact-support, but incomplete without Republican rebuttals, historical context, or polling methodology.
Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
Political Commentary And Analysis
Solid66 ±3Contrariannews accurately reports Trump's order and judicial response, but omits the constitutional and operational case against it—a significant one-sided frame on a disputed legal question.
Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
News Report
Solid68 ±3The Independent's reporting on Flock misuse is well-sourced and substantially verified, but lacks comparative scope on how widespread the problem is.
Analysis of an article by in · Credible
Opinion Book Review
Solid64 ±2The Atlantic's critique rests on solid sourcing but applies literary standards to a devotional work, leaving unexamined why faith audiences might value it differently.
Analysis of an article by in · Credible
News Report
Solid73 ±3The Independent's report on Flock Safety misuse is well-sourced and fact-checked, but omits key context needed to assess whether privacy risks are systemic.
Analysis of an article by in · Credible
The Approach
Deyeken assesses the credibility of the evidentiary record across three weighted axes — source credibility, evidence alignment, and completeness. It surfaces supporting and opposing evidence so you can judge for yourself.