Credibility Analysis System

Credibility, verified by you.

“D’ye ken?” — broad Scots for “do you know?” It’s the question every analysis answers.

Deyeken extracts every claim from an analysis, gathers supporting and opposing evidence, and produces a transparent credibility score — putting the reader back in control.

Create an account Read the whitepaper

~2–11 MINUTES · ~$0.10–$0.85 PER ANALYSIS · PRE-BETA

Published This Week

View all →

Opinion Editorial

Mixed55 ±3

The Future is for Everyone

Meta's superintelligence distribution argument is well-sourced on individual claims but omits structural counterarguments and historical cases where distributed access didn't prevent concentration.

Analysis of an article by in · Unreliable

@doonhammer
1 source

Opinion Editorial

Mixed52 ±3

The Future is for Everyone

Meta opinion piece marshals strong factual support for tech-distribution claims but deliberately sidesteps the technical safety case against superintelligence distribution.

Analysis of an article by in · Unreliable

@doonhammer
1 source

Opinion Analysis

Solid63 ±3

Some Republicans Are Finally Realizing They Wrecked the Middle Class

The New Republic's opinion piece marshals well-sourced claims about Republican economic policy, but omits the substantive counterarguments and quantitative context readers need to evaluate whether Republicans actually caused middle-class decline.

Analysis of an article by in · Moderate

@doonhammer
1 source

Browse by Category

News 28 analyses Opinion & Analysis 56 analyses Investigations 2 analyses Reviews 0 analyses Politics & Policy 6 analyses

Featured Authors

Browse analyses →
@doonhammer Ric

The Approach

A transparent score, not a verdict on truth.

Deyeken assesses the credibility of the evidentiary record across three weighted axes — source credibility, evidence alignment, and completeness. It surfaces supporting and opposing evidence so you can judge for yourself.

Read the whitepaper