Credibility Analysis System
“D’ye ken?” — broad Scots for “do you know?” It’s the question every analysis answers.
Deyeken extracts every claim from an analysis, gathers supporting and opposing evidence, and produces a transparent credibility score — putting the reader back in control.
~2–11 MINUTES · ~$0.10–$0.85 PER ANALYSIS · PRE-BETA
Opinion Editorial
Mixed52 ±3Meta opinion piece marshals strong factual support for tech-distribution claims but deliberately sidesteps the technical safety case against superintelligence distribution.
Analysis of an article by in · Unreliable
Opinion Analysis
Solid63 ±3The New Republic's opinion piece marshals well-sourced claims about Republican economic policy, but omits the substantive counterarguments and quantitative context readers need to evaluate whether Republicans actually caused middle-class decline.
Analysis of an article by in · Moderate
Opinion Editorial
Solid68 ±3Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
Analysis And Commentary
Solid64 ±3Analysis of an article by in · Moderate
Analysis And Commentary
Solid67 ±3Analysis of an article by in · Moderate
Opinion Editorial
Solid69 ±3Analysis of an article by in · Credible
Opinion Editorial
Mixed51 ±4Analysis of an article by in · Unreliable
Investigative News Analysis
Solid76 ±3Analysis of an article by in · Credible
Advocacy Speech Transcript
Weak36 ±4Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
Opinion Analysis
Solid76 ±2Analysis of an article by in · Moderate
Opinion Analysis
Mixed59 ±3Analysis of an article by in · Questionable
Opinion Editorial
Solid65 ±3Analysis of an article by in · Credible
The Approach
Deyeken assesses the credibility of the evidentiary record across three weighted axes — source credibility, evidence alignment, and completeness. It surfaces supporting and opposing evidence so you can judge for yourself.