ascopubs.org

Key factors

• + Peer review system — Double-blind peer review is standard for all published research, with expert editorial boards and rigorous verification of methodology and findings.
• + Professional society affiliation — ASCO is a recognized, established medical professional organization with decades of credibility in oncology; publishing under its name carries institutional accountability.
• + Impact and citation metrics — JCO and related ASCO journals rank among the most cited medical journals globally, indicating broad scientific recognition and influence.
• + Conflict-of-interest disclosures — Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to disclose financial conflicts of interest, funding sources, and affiliations.
• + Corrections and retraction policy — Academic publishing standards include transparent mechanisms for publishing corrections and retracting fraudulent or seriously flawed work.
• + Open access and transparency — ASCO has adopted open-access publishing for selected content and maintains clear indexing in PubMed and Web of Science.

Editorial standards

ASCO Publications adheres to international standards for academic medical publishing, including ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) guidelines, COPE ethical standards, and CONSORT reporting requirements for clinical trials. All original research undergoes double-blind peer review by subject-matter experts. Funding sources, institutional affiliations, and author conflicts of interest are disclosed. The journal maintains clear policies on data availability, trial registration, and protocol transparency.

Fact-checking

As an academic publisher, ASCO employs pre-publication verification through peer review rather than post-publication fact-checking. Retracted articles are rare and typically involve identified fraud, statistical errors, or serious methodological flaws. The journal maintains a transparent retraction log consistent with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines.